feat(project): add initial scaffold, CI, and README
This commit is contained in:
nexusct (Blackbox Agent)
178
strategy/playbooks/phase-0-discovery.md
Normal file
178
strategy/playbooks/phase-0-discovery.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
|
||||
# 🔍 Phase 0 Playbook — Intelligence & Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 3-7 days | **Agents**: 6 | **Gate Keeper**: Executive Summary Generator
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Validate the opportunity before committing resources. No building until the problem, market, and regulatory landscape are understood.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Project brief or initial concept exists
|
||||
- [ ] Stakeholder sponsor identified
|
||||
- [ ] Budget for discovery phase approved
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Activation Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
### Wave 1: Parallel Launch (Day 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔍 Trend Researcher — Market Intelligence Lead
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Trend Researcher for market intelligence on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Competitive landscape analysis (direct + indirect competitors)
|
||||
2. Market sizing: TAM, SAM, SOM with methodology
|
||||
3. Trend lifecycle mapping: where is this market in the adoption curve?
|
||||
4. 3-6 month trend forecast with confidence intervals
|
||||
5. Investment and funding trends in the space
|
||||
|
||||
Sources: Minimum 15 unique, verified sources
|
||||
Format: Strategic Report with executive summary
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 💬 Feedback Synthesizer — User Needs Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Feedback Synthesizer for user needs analysis on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Multi-channel feedback collection plan (surveys, interviews, reviews, social)
|
||||
2. Sentiment analysis across existing user touchpoints
|
||||
3. Pain point identification and prioritization (RICE scored)
|
||||
4. Feature request analysis with business value estimation
|
||||
5. Churn risk indicators from feedback patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Synthesized Feedback Report with priority matrix
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔍 UX Researcher — User Behavior Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate UX Researcher for user behavior analysis on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. User interview plan (5-10 target users)
|
||||
2. Persona development (3-5 primary personas)
|
||||
3. Journey mapping for primary user flows
|
||||
4. Usability heuristic evaluation of competitor products
|
||||
5. Behavioral insights with statistical validation
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Research Findings Report with personas and journey maps
|
||||
Timeline: 5 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Wave 2: Parallel Launch (Day 1, independent of Wave 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 📊 Analytics Reporter — Data Landscape Assessment
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Analytics Reporter for data landscape assessment on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Existing data source audit (what data is available?)
|
||||
2. Signal identification (what can we measure?)
|
||||
3. Baseline metrics establishment
|
||||
4. Data quality assessment with completeness scoring
|
||||
5. Analytics infrastructure recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Data Audit Report with signal map
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### ⚖️ Legal Compliance Checker — Regulatory Scan
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Legal Compliance Checker for regulatory scan on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Applicable regulatory frameworks (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, etc.)
|
||||
2. Data handling requirements and constraints
|
||||
3. Jurisdiction mapping for target markets
|
||||
4. Compliance risk assessment with severity ratings
|
||||
5. Blocking vs. manageable compliance issues
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Compliance Requirements Matrix
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🛠️ Tool Evaluator — Technology Landscape
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Tool Evaluator for technology landscape assessment on [PROJECT DOMAIN].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Technology stack assessment for the problem domain
|
||||
2. Build vs. buy analysis for key components
|
||||
3. Integration feasibility with existing systems
|
||||
4. Open source vs. commercial evaluation
|
||||
5. Technology risk assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Tech Stack Assessment with recommendation matrix
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Convergence Point (Day 5-7)
|
||||
|
||||
All six agents deliver their reports. The Executive Summary Generator synthesizes:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Executive Summary Generator to synthesize Phase 0 findings.
|
||||
|
||||
Input documents:
|
||||
1. Trend Researcher → Market Analysis Report
|
||||
2. Feedback Synthesizer → Synthesized Feedback Report
|
||||
3. UX Researcher → Research Findings Report
|
||||
4. Analytics Reporter → Data Audit Report
|
||||
5. Legal Compliance Checker → Compliance Requirements Matrix
|
||||
6. Tool Evaluator → Tech Stack Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Output: Executive Summary (≤500 words, SCQA format)
|
||||
Decision required: GO / NO-GO / PIVOT
|
||||
Include: Quantified market opportunity, validated user needs, regulatory path, technology feasibility
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Evidence Source | Status |
|
||||
|---|-----------|----------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | Market opportunity validated with TAM > minimum viable threshold | Trend Researcher report | ☐ |
|
||||
| 2 | ≥3 validated user pain points with supporting data | Feedback Synthesizer + UX Researcher | ☐ |
|
||||
| 3 | No blocking compliance issues identified | Legal Compliance Checker matrix | ☐ |
|
||||
| 4 | Key metrics and data sources identified | Analytics Reporter audit | ☐ |
|
||||
| 5 | Technology stack feasible and assessed | Tool Evaluator assessment | ☐ |
|
||||
| 6 | Executive summary delivered with GO/NO-GO recommendation | Executive Summary Generator | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
- **GO**: Proceed to Phase 1 — Strategy & Architecture
|
||||
- **NO-GO**: Archive findings, document learnings, redirect resources
|
||||
- **PIVOT**: Modify scope/direction based on findings, re-run targeted discovery
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff to Phase 1
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 0 → Phase 1 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### Documents to carry forward:
|
||||
1. Market Analysis Report (Trend Researcher)
|
||||
2. Synthesized Feedback Report (Feedback Synthesizer)
|
||||
3. User Personas and Journey Maps (UX Researcher)
|
||||
4. Data Audit Report (Analytics Reporter)
|
||||
5. Compliance Requirements Matrix (Legal Compliance Checker)
|
||||
6. Tech Stack Assessment (Tool Evaluator)
|
||||
7. Executive Summary with GO decision (Executive Summary Generator)
|
||||
|
||||
### Key constraints identified:
|
||||
- [Regulatory constraints from Legal Compliance Checker]
|
||||
- [Technical constraints from Tool Evaluator]
|
||||
- [Market timing constraints from Trend Researcher]
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority user needs (for Sprint Prioritizer):
|
||||
1. [Pain point 1 — from Feedback Synthesizer]
|
||||
2. [Pain point 2 — from UX Researcher]
|
||||
3. [Pain point 3 — from Feedback Synthesizer]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 0 is complete when the Executive Summary Generator delivers a GO decision with supporting evidence from all six discovery agents.*
|
||||
238
strategy/playbooks/phase-1-strategy.md
Normal file
238
strategy/playbooks/phase-1-strategy.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
|
||||
# 🏗️ Phase 1 Playbook — Strategy & Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 5-10 days | **Agents**: 8 | **Gate Keepers**: Studio Producer + Reality Checker
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Define what we're building, how it's structured, and what success looks like — before writing a single line of code. Every architectural decision is documented. Every feature is prioritized. Every dollar is accounted for.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 0 Quality Gate passed (GO decision)
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 0 Handoff Package received
|
||||
- [ ] Stakeholder alignment on project scope
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Activation Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Strategic Framing (Day 1-3, Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🎬 Studio Producer — Strategic Portfolio Alignment
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Studio Producer for strategic portfolio alignment on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Phase 0 Executive Summary + Market Analysis Report
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Strategic Portfolio Plan with project positioning
|
||||
2. Vision, objectives, and ROI targets
|
||||
3. Resource allocation strategy
|
||||
4. Risk/reward assessment
|
||||
5. Success criteria and milestone definitions
|
||||
|
||||
Align with: Organizational strategic objectives
|
||||
Format: Strategic Portfolio Plan Template
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🎭 Brand Guardian — Brand Identity System
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Brand Guardian for brand identity development on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Phase 0 UX Research (personas, journey maps)
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Brand Foundation (purpose, vision, mission, values, personality)
|
||||
2. Visual Identity System (colors, typography, spacing as CSS variables)
|
||||
3. Brand Voice and Messaging Architecture
|
||||
4. Logo system specifications (if new brand)
|
||||
5. Brand usage guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Brand Identity System Document
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 💰 Finance Tracker — Budget and Resource Planning
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Finance Tracker for financial planning on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Studio Producer strategic plan + Phase 0 Tech Stack Assessment
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Comprehensive project budget with category breakdown
|
||||
2. Resource cost projections (agents, infrastructure, tools)
|
||||
3. ROI model with break-even analysis
|
||||
4. Cash flow timeline
|
||||
5. Financial risk assessment with contingency reserves
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Financial Plan with ROI Projections
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Technical Architecture (Day 3-7, Parallel, after Step 1 outputs available)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏛️ UX Architect — Technical Architecture + UX Foundation
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate UX Architect for technical architecture on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Brand Guardian visual identity + Phase 0 UX Research
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. CSS Design System (variables, tokens, scales)
|
||||
2. Layout Framework (Grid/Flexbox patterns, responsive breakpoints)
|
||||
3. Component Architecture (naming conventions, hierarchy)
|
||||
4. Information Architecture (page flow, content hierarchy)
|
||||
5. Theme System (light/dark/system toggle)
|
||||
6. Accessibility Foundation (WCAG 2.1 AA baseline)
|
||||
|
||||
Files to create:
|
||||
- css/design-system.css
|
||||
- css/layout.css
|
||||
- css/components.css
|
||||
- docs/ux-architecture.md
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Developer-Ready Foundation Package
|
||||
Timeline: 4 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏗️ Backend Architect — System Architecture
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Backend Architect for system architecture on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Phase 0 Tech Stack Assessment + Compliance Requirements
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. System Architecture Specification
|
||||
- Architecture pattern (microservices/monolith/serverless/hybrid)
|
||||
- Communication pattern (REST/GraphQL/gRPC/event-driven)
|
||||
- Data pattern (CQRS/Event Sourcing/CRUD)
|
||||
2. Database Schema Design with indexing strategy
|
||||
3. API Design Specification with versioning
|
||||
4. Authentication and Authorization Architecture
|
||||
5. Security Architecture (defense in depth)
|
||||
6. Scalability Plan (horizontal scaling strategy)
|
||||
|
||||
Format: System Architecture Specification
|
||||
Timeline: 4 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🤖 AI Engineer — ML Architecture (if applicable)
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate AI Engineer for ML system architecture on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Backend Architect system architecture + Phase 0 Data Audit
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. ML System Design
|
||||
- Model selection and training strategy
|
||||
- Data pipeline architecture
|
||||
- Inference strategy (real-time/batch/edge)
|
||||
2. AI Ethics and Safety Framework
|
||||
3. Model monitoring and retraining plan
|
||||
4. Integration points with main application
|
||||
5. Cost projections for ML infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
Condition: Only activate if project includes AI/ML features
|
||||
Format: ML System Design Document
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 👔 Senior Project Manager — Spec-to-Task Conversion
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Senior Project Manager for task list creation on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: ALL Phase 0 documents + Architecture specs (as available)
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Comprehensive Task List
|
||||
- Quote EXACT requirements from spec (no luxury features)
|
||||
- Each task has clear acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Dependencies mapped between tasks
|
||||
- Effort estimates (story points or hours)
|
||||
2. Work Breakdown Structure
|
||||
3. Critical path identification
|
||||
4. Risk register for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
- Do NOT add features not in the specification
|
||||
- Quote exact text from requirements
|
||||
- Be realistic about effort estimates
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Task List with acceptance criteria
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Prioritization (Day 7-10, Sequential, after Step 2)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🎯 Sprint Prioritizer — Feature Prioritization
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Sprint Prioritizer for backlog prioritization on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input:
|
||||
- Senior Project Manager → Task List
|
||||
- Backend Architect → System Architecture
|
||||
- UX Architect → UX Architecture
|
||||
- Finance Tracker → Budget Framework
|
||||
- Studio Producer → Strategic Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. RICE-scored backlog (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort)
|
||||
2. Sprint assignments with velocity-based estimation
|
||||
3. Dependency map with critical path
|
||||
4. MoSCoW classification (Must/Should/Could/Won't)
|
||||
5. Release plan with milestone mapping
|
||||
|
||||
Validation: Studio Producer confirms strategic alignment
|
||||
Format: Prioritized Sprint Plan
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Evidence Source | Status |
|
||||
|---|-----------|----------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | Architecture covers 100% of spec requirements | Senior PM task list cross-referenced with architecture | ☐ |
|
||||
| 2 | Brand system complete (logo, colors, typography, voice) | Brand Guardian deliverable | ☐ |
|
||||
| 3 | All technical components have implementation path | Backend Architect + UX Architect specs | ☐ |
|
||||
| 4 | Budget approved and within constraints | Finance Tracker plan | ☐ |
|
||||
| 5 | Sprint plan is velocity-based and realistic | Sprint Prioritizer backlog | ☐ |
|
||||
| 6 | Security architecture defined | Backend Architect security spec | ☐ |
|
||||
| 7 | Compliance requirements integrated into architecture | Legal requirements mapped to technical decisions | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Dual sign-off required**: Studio Producer (strategic) + Reality Checker (technical)
|
||||
|
||||
- **APPROVED**: Proceed to Phase 2 with full Architecture Package
|
||||
- **REVISE**: Specific items need rework (return to relevant Step)
|
||||
- **RESTRUCTURE**: Fundamental architecture issues (restart Phase 1)
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff to Phase 2
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 1 → Phase 2 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Package:
|
||||
1. Strategic Portfolio Plan (Studio Producer)
|
||||
2. Brand Identity System (Brand Guardian)
|
||||
3. Financial Plan (Finance Tracker)
|
||||
4. CSS Design System + UX Architecture (UX Architect)
|
||||
5. System Architecture Specification (Backend Architect)
|
||||
6. ML System Design (AI Engineer — if applicable)
|
||||
7. Comprehensive Task List (Senior Project Manager)
|
||||
8. Prioritized Sprint Plan (Sprint Prioritizer)
|
||||
|
||||
### For DevOps Automator:
|
||||
- Deployment architecture from Backend Architect
|
||||
- Environment requirements from System Architecture
|
||||
- Monitoring requirements from Infrastructure needs
|
||||
|
||||
### For Frontend Developer:
|
||||
- CSS Design System from UX Architect
|
||||
- Brand Identity from Brand Guardian
|
||||
- Component architecture from UX Architect
|
||||
- API specification from Backend Architect
|
||||
|
||||
### For Backend Architect (continuing):
|
||||
- Database schema ready for deployment
|
||||
- API scaffold ready for implementation
|
||||
- Auth system architecture defined
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 1 is complete when Studio Producer and Reality Checker both sign off on the Architecture Package.*
|
||||
278
strategy/playbooks/phase-2-foundation.md
Normal file
278
strategy/playbooks/phase-2-foundation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
|
||||
# ⚙️ Phase 2 Playbook — Foundation & Scaffolding
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 3-5 days | **Agents**: 6 | **Gate Keepers**: DevOps Automator + Evidence Collector
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Build the technical and operational foundation that all subsequent work depends on. Get the skeleton standing before adding muscle. After this phase, every developer has a working environment, a deployable pipeline, and a design system to build with.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 1 Quality Gate passed (Architecture Package approved)
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 1 Handoff Package received
|
||||
- [ ] All architecture documents finalized
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Activation Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
### Workstream A: Infrastructure (Day 1-3, Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🚀 DevOps Automator — CI/CD Pipeline + Infrastructure
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate DevOps Automator for infrastructure setup on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Backend Architect system architecture + deployment requirements
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. CI/CD Pipeline (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI)
|
||||
- Security scanning stage
|
||||
- Automated testing stage
|
||||
- Build and containerization stage
|
||||
- Deployment stage (blue-green or canary)
|
||||
- Automated rollback capability
|
||||
2. Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
- Environment provisioning (dev, staging, production)
|
||||
- Container orchestration setup
|
||||
- Network and security configuration
|
||||
3. Environment Configuration
|
||||
- Secrets management
|
||||
- Environment variable management
|
||||
- Multi-environment parity
|
||||
|
||||
Files to create:
|
||||
- .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml (or equivalent)
|
||||
- infrastructure/ (Terraform/CDK templates)
|
||||
- docker-compose.yml
|
||||
- Dockerfile(s)
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Working CI/CD pipeline with IaC templates
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏗️ Infrastructure Maintainer — Cloud Infrastructure + Monitoring
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Infrastructure Maintainer for monitoring setup on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: DevOps Automator infrastructure + Backend Architect architecture
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Cloud Resource Provisioning
|
||||
- Compute, storage, networking resources
|
||||
- Auto-scaling configuration
|
||||
- Load balancer setup
|
||||
2. Monitoring Stack
|
||||
- Application metrics (Prometheus/DataDog)
|
||||
- Infrastructure metrics
|
||||
- Custom dashboards (Grafana)
|
||||
3. Logging and Alerting
|
||||
- Centralized log aggregation
|
||||
- Alert rules for critical thresholds
|
||||
- On-call notification setup
|
||||
4. Security Hardening
|
||||
- Firewall rules
|
||||
- SSL/TLS configuration
|
||||
- Access control policies
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Infrastructure Readiness Report with dashboard access
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### ⚙️ Studio Operations — Process Setup
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Studio Operations for process setup on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Sprint Prioritizer plan + Project Shepherd coordination needs
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Git Workflow
|
||||
- Branch strategy (GitFlow / trunk-based)
|
||||
- PR review process
|
||||
- Merge policies
|
||||
2. Communication Channels
|
||||
- Team channels setup
|
||||
- Notification routing
|
||||
- Status update cadence
|
||||
3. Documentation Templates
|
||||
- PR template
|
||||
- Issue template
|
||||
- Decision log template
|
||||
4. Collaboration Tools
|
||||
- Project board setup
|
||||
- Sprint tracking configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Operations Playbook
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Workstream B: Application Foundation (Day 1-4, Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🎨 Frontend Developer — Project Scaffolding + Component Library
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Frontend Developer for project scaffolding on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: UX Architect CSS Design System + Brand Guardian identity
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Project Scaffolding
|
||||
- Framework setup (React/Vue/Angular per architecture)
|
||||
- TypeScript configuration
|
||||
- Build tooling (Vite/Webpack/Next.js)
|
||||
- Testing framework (Jest/Vitest + Testing Library)
|
||||
2. Design System Implementation
|
||||
- CSS design tokens from UX Architect
|
||||
- Base component library (Button, Input, Card, Layout)
|
||||
- Theme system (light/dark/system toggle)
|
||||
- Responsive utilities
|
||||
3. Application Shell
|
||||
- Routing setup
|
||||
- Layout components (Header, Footer, Sidebar)
|
||||
- Error boundary implementation
|
||||
- Loading states
|
||||
|
||||
Files to create:
|
||||
- src/ (application source)
|
||||
- src/components/ (component library)
|
||||
- src/styles/ (design tokens)
|
||||
- src/layouts/ (layout components)
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Working application skeleton with component library
|
||||
Timeline: 3 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏗️ Backend Architect — Database + API Foundation
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Backend Architect for API foundation on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: System Architecture Specification + Database Schema Design
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Database Setup
|
||||
- Schema deployment (migrations)
|
||||
- Index creation
|
||||
- Seed data for development
|
||||
- Connection pooling configuration
|
||||
2. API Scaffold
|
||||
- Framework setup (Express/FastAPI/etc.)
|
||||
- Route structure matching architecture
|
||||
- Middleware stack (auth, validation, error handling, CORS)
|
||||
- Health check endpoints
|
||||
3. Authentication System
|
||||
- Auth provider integration
|
||||
- JWT/session management
|
||||
- Role-based access control scaffold
|
||||
4. Service Communication
|
||||
- API versioning setup
|
||||
- Request/response serialization
|
||||
- Error response standardization
|
||||
|
||||
Files to create:
|
||||
- api/ or server/ (backend source)
|
||||
- migrations/ (database migrations)
|
||||
- docs/api-spec.yaml (OpenAPI specification)
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Working API scaffold with database and auth
|
||||
Timeline: 4 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏛️ UX Architect — CSS System Implementation
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate UX Architect for CSS system implementation on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Brand Guardian identity + own Phase 1 CSS Design System spec
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Design Tokens Implementation
|
||||
- CSS custom properties (colors, typography, spacing)
|
||||
- Brand color palette with semantic naming
|
||||
- Typography scale with responsive adjustments
|
||||
2. Layout System
|
||||
- Container system (responsive breakpoints)
|
||||
- Grid patterns (2-col, 3-col, sidebar)
|
||||
- Flexbox utilities
|
||||
3. Theme System
|
||||
- Light theme variables
|
||||
- Dark theme variables
|
||||
- System preference detection
|
||||
- Theme toggle component
|
||||
- Smooth transition between themes
|
||||
|
||||
Files to create/update:
|
||||
- css/design-system.css (or equivalent in framework)
|
||||
- css/layout.css
|
||||
- css/components.css
|
||||
- js/theme-manager.js
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Implemented CSS design system with theme toggle
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification Checkpoint (Day 4-5)
|
||||
|
||||
### Evidence Collector Verification
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Evidence Collector for Phase 2 foundation verification.
|
||||
|
||||
Verify the following with screenshot evidence:
|
||||
1. CI/CD pipeline executes successfully (show pipeline logs)
|
||||
2. Application skeleton loads in browser (desktop screenshot)
|
||||
3. Application skeleton loads on mobile (mobile screenshot)
|
||||
4. Theme toggle works (light + dark screenshots)
|
||||
5. API health check responds (curl output)
|
||||
6. Database is accessible (migration status)
|
||||
7. Monitoring dashboards are active (dashboard screenshot)
|
||||
8. Component library renders (component demo page)
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Evidence Package with screenshots
|
||||
Verdict: PASS / FAIL with specific issues
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Evidence Source | Status |
|
||||
|---|-----------|----------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | CI/CD pipeline builds, tests, and deploys | Pipeline execution logs | ☐ |
|
||||
| 2 | Database schema deployed with all tables/indexes | Migration success output | ☐ |
|
||||
| 3 | API scaffold responding on health check | curl response evidence | ☐ |
|
||||
| 4 | Frontend skeleton renders in browser | Evidence Collector screenshots | ☐ |
|
||||
| 5 | Monitoring dashboards showing metrics | Dashboard screenshots | ☐ |
|
||||
| 6 | Design system tokens implemented | Component library demo | ☐ |
|
||||
| 7 | Theme toggle functional (light/dark/system) | Before/after screenshots | ☐ |
|
||||
| 8 | Git workflow and processes documented | Studio Operations playbook | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Dual sign-off required**: DevOps Automator (infrastructure) + Evidence Collector (visual)
|
||||
|
||||
- **PASS**: Working skeleton with full DevOps pipeline → Phase 3 activation
|
||||
- **FAIL**: Specific infrastructure or application issues → Fix and re-verify
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff to Phase 3
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 2 → Phase 3 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### For all Developer Agents:
|
||||
- Working CI/CD pipeline (auto-deploys on merge)
|
||||
- Design system tokens and component library
|
||||
- API scaffold with auth and health checks
|
||||
- Database with schema and seed data
|
||||
- Git workflow and PR process
|
||||
|
||||
### For Evidence Collector (ongoing QA):
|
||||
- Application URLs (dev, staging)
|
||||
- Screenshot capture methodology
|
||||
- Component library reference
|
||||
- Brand guidelines for visual verification
|
||||
|
||||
### For Agents Orchestrator (Dev↔QA loop management):
|
||||
- Sprint Prioritizer backlog (from Phase 1)
|
||||
- Task list with acceptance criteria (from Phase 1)
|
||||
- Agent assignment matrix (from NEXUS strategy)
|
||||
- Quality thresholds for each task type
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Access:
|
||||
- Dev environment: [URL]
|
||||
- Staging environment: [URL]
|
||||
- Monitoring dashboard: [URL]
|
||||
- CI/CD pipeline: [URL]
|
||||
- API documentation: [URL]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 2 is complete when the skeleton application is running, the CI/CD pipeline is operational, and the Evidence Collector has verified all foundation elements with screenshots.*
|
||||
286
strategy/playbooks/phase-3-build.md
Normal file
286
strategy/playbooks/phase-3-build.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
|
||||
# 🔨 Phase 3 Playbook — Build & Iterate
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 2-12 weeks (varies by scope) | **Agents**: 15-30+ | **Gate Keeper**: Agents Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Implement all features through continuous Dev↔QA loops. Every task is validated before the next begins. This is where the bulk of the work happens — and where NEXUS's orchestration delivers the most value.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 2 Quality Gate passed (foundation verified)
|
||||
- [ ] Sprint Prioritizer backlog available with RICE scores
|
||||
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
|
||||
- [ ] Design system and component library ready
|
||||
- [ ] API scaffold with auth system ready
|
||||
|
||||
## The Dev↔QA Loop — Core Mechanic
|
||||
|
||||
The Agents Orchestrator manages every task through this cycle:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
FOR EACH task IN sprint_backlog (ordered by RICE score):
|
||||
|
||||
1. ASSIGN task to appropriate Developer Agent (see assignment matrix)
|
||||
2. Developer IMPLEMENTS task
|
||||
3. Evidence Collector TESTS task
|
||||
- Visual screenshots (desktop, tablet, mobile)
|
||||
- Functional verification against acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Brand consistency check
|
||||
4. IF verdict == PASS:
|
||||
Mark task complete
|
||||
Move to next task
|
||||
ELIF verdict == FAIL AND attempts < 3:
|
||||
Send QA feedback to Developer
|
||||
Developer FIXES specific issues
|
||||
Return to step 3
|
||||
ELIF attempts >= 3:
|
||||
ESCALATE to Agents Orchestrator
|
||||
Orchestrator decides: reassign, decompose, defer, or accept
|
||||
5. UPDATE pipeline status report
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Assignment Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Developer Assignment
|
||||
|
||||
| Task Category | Primary Agent | Backup Agent | QA Agent |
|
||||
|--------------|--------------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| **React/Vue/Angular UI** | Frontend Developer | Rapid Prototyper | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **REST/GraphQL API** | Backend Architect | Senior Developer | API Tester |
|
||||
| **Database operations** | Backend Architect | — | API Tester |
|
||||
| **Mobile (iOS/Android)** | Mobile App Builder | — | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **ML model/pipeline** | AI Engineer | — | Test Results Analyzer |
|
||||
| **CI/CD/Infrastructure** | DevOps Automator | Infrastructure Maintainer | Performance Benchmarker |
|
||||
| **Premium/complex feature** | Senior Developer | Backend Architect | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **Quick prototype/POC** | Rapid Prototyper | Frontend Developer | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **WebXR/immersive** | XR Immersive Developer | — | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **visionOS** | visionOS Spatial Engineer | macOS Spatial/Metal Engineer | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **Cockpit controls** | XR Cockpit Interaction Specialist | XR Interface Architect | Evidence Collector |
|
||||
| **CLI/terminal tools** | Terminal Integration Specialist | — | API Tester |
|
||||
| **Code intelligence** | LSP/Index Engineer | — | Test Results Analyzer |
|
||||
| **Performance optimization** | Performance Benchmarker | Infrastructure Maintainer | Performance Benchmarker |
|
||||
|
||||
### Specialist Support (activated as needed)
|
||||
|
||||
| Specialist | When to Activate | Trigger |
|
||||
|-----------|-----------------|---------|
|
||||
| UI Designer | Component needs visual refinement | Developer requests design guidance |
|
||||
| Whimsy Injector | Feature needs delight/personality | UX review identifies opportunity |
|
||||
| Visual Storyteller | Visual narrative content needed | Content requires visual assets |
|
||||
| Brand Guardian | Brand consistency concern | QA finds brand deviation |
|
||||
| XR Interface Architect | Spatial interaction design needed | XR feature requires UX guidance |
|
||||
| Data Analytics Reporter | Deep data analysis needed | Feature requires analytics integration |
|
||||
|
||||
## Parallel Build Tracks
|
||||
|
||||
For NEXUS-Full deployments, four tracks run simultaneously:
|
||||
|
||||
### Track A: Core Product Development
|
||||
```
|
||||
Managed by: Agents Orchestrator (Dev↔QA loop)
|
||||
Agents: Frontend Developer, Backend Architect, AI Engineer,
|
||||
Mobile App Builder, Senior Developer
|
||||
QA: Evidence Collector, API Tester, Test Results Analyzer
|
||||
|
||||
Sprint cadence: 2-week sprints
|
||||
Daily: Task implementation + QA validation
|
||||
End of sprint: Sprint review + retrospective
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Track B: Growth & Marketing Preparation
|
||||
```
|
||||
Managed by: Project Shepherd
|
||||
Agents: Growth Hacker, Content Creator, Social Media Strategist,
|
||||
App Store Optimizer
|
||||
|
||||
Sprint cadence: Aligned with Track A milestones
|
||||
Activities:
|
||||
- Growth Hacker → Design viral loops and referral mechanics
|
||||
- Content Creator → Build launch content pipeline
|
||||
- Social Media Strategist → Plan cross-platform campaign
|
||||
- App Store Optimizer → Prepare store listing (if mobile)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Track C: Quality & Operations
|
||||
```
|
||||
Managed by: Agents Orchestrator
|
||||
Agents: Evidence Collector, API Tester, Performance Benchmarker,
|
||||
Workflow Optimizer, Experiment Tracker
|
||||
|
||||
Continuous activities:
|
||||
- Evidence Collector → Screenshot QA for every task
|
||||
- API Tester → Endpoint validation for every API task
|
||||
- Performance Benchmarker → Periodic load testing
|
||||
- Workflow Optimizer → Process improvement identification
|
||||
- Experiment Tracker → A/B test setup for validated features
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Track D: Brand & Experience Polish
|
||||
```
|
||||
Managed by: Brand Guardian
|
||||
Agents: UI Designer, Brand Guardian, Visual Storyteller,
|
||||
Whimsy Injector
|
||||
|
||||
Triggered activities:
|
||||
- UI Designer → Component refinement when QA identifies visual issues
|
||||
- Brand Guardian → Periodic brand consistency audit
|
||||
- Visual Storyteller → Visual narrative assets as features complete
|
||||
- Whimsy Injector → Micro-interactions and delight moments
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Sprint Execution Template
|
||||
|
||||
### Sprint Planning (Day 1)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Sprint Prioritizer activates:
|
||||
1. Review backlog with updated RICE scores
|
||||
2. Select tasks for sprint based on team velocity
|
||||
3. Assign tasks to developer agents
|
||||
4. Identify dependencies and ordering
|
||||
5. Set sprint goal and success criteria
|
||||
|
||||
Output: Sprint Plan with task assignments
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily Execution (Day 2 to Day N-1)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Agents Orchestrator manages:
|
||||
1. Current task status check
|
||||
2. Dev↔QA loop execution
|
||||
3. Blocker identification and resolution
|
||||
4. Progress tracking and reporting
|
||||
|
||||
Status report format:
|
||||
- Tasks completed today: [list]
|
||||
- Tasks in QA: [list]
|
||||
- Tasks in development: [list]
|
||||
- Blocked tasks: [list with reason]
|
||||
- QA pass rate: [X/Y]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Sprint Review (Day N)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Project Shepherd facilitates:
|
||||
1. Demo completed features
|
||||
2. Review QA evidence for each task
|
||||
3. Collect stakeholder feedback
|
||||
4. Update backlog based on learnings
|
||||
|
||||
Participants: All active agents + stakeholders
|
||||
Output: Sprint Review Summary
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Sprint Retrospective
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Workflow Optimizer facilitates:
|
||||
1. What went well?
|
||||
2. What could improve?
|
||||
3. What will we change next sprint?
|
||||
4. Process efficiency metrics
|
||||
|
||||
Output: Retrospective Action Items
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Orchestrator Decision Logic
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Failure Handling
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
WHEN task fails QA:
|
||||
IF attempt == 1:
|
||||
→ Send specific QA feedback to developer
|
||||
→ Developer fixes ONLY the identified issues
|
||||
→ Re-submit for QA
|
||||
|
||||
IF attempt == 2:
|
||||
→ Send accumulated QA feedback
|
||||
→ Consider: Is the developer agent the right fit?
|
||||
→ Developer fixes with additional context
|
||||
→ Re-submit for QA
|
||||
|
||||
IF attempt == 3:
|
||||
→ ESCALATE
|
||||
→ Options:
|
||||
a) Reassign to different developer agent
|
||||
b) Decompose task into smaller sub-tasks
|
||||
c) Revise approach/architecture
|
||||
d) Accept with known limitations (document)
|
||||
e) Defer to future sprint
|
||||
→ Document decision and rationale
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Parallel Task Management
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
WHEN multiple tasks have no dependencies:
|
||||
→ Assign to different developer agents simultaneously
|
||||
→ Each runs independent Dev↔QA loop
|
||||
→ Orchestrator tracks all loops concurrently
|
||||
→ Merge completed tasks in dependency order
|
||||
|
||||
WHEN task has dependencies:
|
||||
→ Wait for dependency to pass QA
|
||||
→ Then assign dependent task
|
||||
→ Include dependency context in handoff
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Evidence Source | Status |
|
||||
|---|-----------|----------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | All sprint tasks pass QA (100% completion) | Evidence Collector screenshots per task | ☐ |
|
||||
| 2 | All API endpoints validated | API Tester regression report | ☐ |
|
||||
| 3 | Performance baselines met (P95 < 200ms) | Performance Benchmarker report | ☐ |
|
||||
| 4 | Brand consistency verified (95%+ adherence) | Brand Guardian audit | ☐ |
|
||||
| 5 | No critical bugs (zero P0/P1 open) | Test Results Analyzer summary | ☐ |
|
||||
| 6 | All acceptance criteria met | Task-by-task verification | ☐ |
|
||||
| 7 | Code review completed for all PRs | Git history evidence | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Gate Keeper**: Agents Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
- **PASS**: Feature-complete application → Phase 4 activation
|
||||
- **CONTINUE**: More sprints needed → Continue Phase 3
|
||||
- **ESCALATE**: Systemic issues → Studio Producer intervention
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff to Phase 4
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 3 → Phase 4 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### For Reality Checker:
|
||||
- Complete application (all features implemented)
|
||||
- All QA evidence from Dev↔QA loops
|
||||
- API Tester regression results
|
||||
- Performance Benchmarker baseline data
|
||||
- Brand Guardian consistency audit
|
||||
- Known issues list (if any accepted limitations)
|
||||
|
||||
### For Legal Compliance Checker:
|
||||
- Data handling implementation details
|
||||
- Privacy policy implementation
|
||||
- Consent management implementation
|
||||
- Security measures implemented
|
||||
|
||||
### For Performance Benchmarker:
|
||||
- Application URLs for load testing
|
||||
- Expected traffic patterns
|
||||
- Performance budgets from architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### For Infrastructure Maintainer:
|
||||
- Production environment requirements
|
||||
- Scaling configuration needs
|
||||
- Monitoring alert thresholds
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 3 is complete when all sprint tasks pass QA, all API endpoints are validated, performance baselines are met, and no critical bugs remain open.*
|
||||
332
strategy/playbooks/phase-4-hardening.md
Normal file
332
strategy/playbooks/phase-4-hardening.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
|
||||
# 🛡️ Phase 4 Playbook — Quality & Hardening
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 3-7 days | **Agents**: 8 | **Gate Keeper**: Reality Checker (sole authority)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
The final quality gauntlet. The Reality Checker defaults to "NEEDS WORK" — you must prove production readiness with overwhelming evidence. This phase exists because first implementations typically need 2-3 revision cycles, and that's healthy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 3 Quality Gate passed (all tasks QA'd)
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 3 Handoff Package received
|
||||
- [ ] All features implemented and individually verified
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Mindset
|
||||
|
||||
> **The Reality Checker's default verdict is NEEDS WORK.**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This is not pessimism — it's realism. Production readiness requires:
|
||||
> - Complete user journeys working end-to-end
|
||||
> - Cross-device consistency (desktop, tablet, mobile)
|
||||
> - Performance under load (not just happy path)
|
||||
> - Security validation (not just "we added auth")
|
||||
> - Specification compliance (every requirement, not most)
|
||||
>
|
||||
> A B/B+ rating on first pass is normal and expected.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Activation Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Evidence Collection (Day 1-2, All Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 📸 Evidence Collector — Comprehensive Visual Evidence
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Evidence Collector for comprehensive system evidence on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Full screenshot suite:
|
||||
- Desktop (1920x1080) — every page/view
|
||||
- Tablet (768x1024) — every page/view
|
||||
- Mobile (375x667) — every page/view
|
||||
2. Interaction evidence:
|
||||
- Navigation flows (before/after clicks)
|
||||
- Form interactions (empty, filled, submitted, error states)
|
||||
- Modal/dialog interactions
|
||||
- Accordion/expandable content
|
||||
3. Theme evidence:
|
||||
- Light mode — all pages
|
||||
- Dark mode — all pages
|
||||
- System preference detection
|
||||
4. Error state evidence:
|
||||
- 404 pages
|
||||
- Form validation errors
|
||||
- Network error handling
|
||||
- Empty states
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Screenshot Evidence Package with test-results.json
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔌 API Tester — Full API Regression
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate API Tester for complete API regression on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Endpoint regression suite:
|
||||
- All endpoints tested (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
|
||||
- Authentication/authorization verification
|
||||
- Input validation testing
|
||||
- Error response verification
|
||||
2. Integration testing:
|
||||
- Cross-service communication
|
||||
- Database operation verification
|
||||
- External API integration
|
||||
3. Edge case testing:
|
||||
- Rate limiting behavior
|
||||
- Large payload handling
|
||||
- Concurrent request handling
|
||||
- Malformed input handling
|
||||
|
||||
Format: API Test Report with pass/fail per endpoint
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### ⚡ Performance Benchmarker — Load Testing
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Performance Benchmarker for load testing on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Load test at 10x expected traffic:
|
||||
- Response time distribution (P50, P95, P99)
|
||||
- Throughput under load
|
||||
- Error rate under load
|
||||
- Resource utilization (CPU, memory, network)
|
||||
2. Core Web Vitals measurement:
|
||||
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s
|
||||
- FID (First Input Delay) < 100ms
|
||||
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1
|
||||
3. Database performance:
|
||||
- Query execution times
|
||||
- Connection pool utilization
|
||||
- Index effectiveness
|
||||
4. Stress test results:
|
||||
- Breaking point identification
|
||||
- Graceful degradation behavior
|
||||
- Recovery time after overload
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Performance Certification Report
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### ⚖️ Legal Compliance Checker — Final Compliance Audit
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Legal Compliance Checker for final compliance audit on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Privacy compliance verification:
|
||||
- Privacy policy accuracy
|
||||
- Consent management functionality
|
||||
- Data subject rights implementation
|
||||
- Cookie consent implementation
|
||||
2. Security compliance:
|
||||
- Data encryption (at rest and in transit)
|
||||
- Authentication security
|
||||
- Input sanitization
|
||||
- OWASP Top 10 check
|
||||
3. Regulatory compliance:
|
||||
- GDPR requirements (if applicable)
|
||||
- CCPA requirements (if applicable)
|
||||
- Industry-specific requirements
|
||||
4. Accessibility compliance:
|
||||
- WCAG 2.1 AA verification
|
||||
- Screen reader compatibility
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Compliance Certification Report
|
||||
Timeline: 2 days
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Analysis (Day 3-4, Parallel, after Step 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 📊 Test Results Analyzer — Quality Metrics Aggregation
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Test Results Analyzer for quality metrics aggregation on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: ALL Step 1 reports
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Aggregate quality dashboard:
|
||||
- Overall quality score
|
||||
- Category breakdown (visual, functional, performance, security, compliance)
|
||||
- Issue severity distribution
|
||||
- Trend analysis (if multiple test cycles)
|
||||
2. Issue prioritization:
|
||||
- Critical issues (must fix before production)
|
||||
- High issues (should fix before production)
|
||||
- Medium issues (fix in next sprint)
|
||||
- Low issues (backlog)
|
||||
3. Risk assessment:
|
||||
- Production readiness probability
|
||||
- Remaining risk areas
|
||||
- Recommended mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Quality Metrics Dashboard
|
||||
Timeline: 1 day
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔄 Workflow Optimizer — Process Efficiency Review
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Workflow Optimizer for process efficiency review on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Input: Phase 3 execution data + Step 1 findings
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Process efficiency analysis:
|
||||
- Dev↔QA loop efficiency (first-pass rate, average retries)
|
||||
- Bottleneck identification
|
||||
- Time-to-resolution for different issue types
|
||||
2. Improvement recommendations:
|
||||
- Process changes for Phase 6 operations
|
||||
- Automation opportunities
|
||||
- Quality improvement suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Optimization Recommendations Report
|
||||
Timeline: 1 day
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🏗️ Infrastructure Maintainer — Production Readiness Check
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Infrastructure Maintainer for production readiness on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverables required:
|
||||
1. Production environment validation:
|
||||
- All services healthy and responding
|
||||
- Auto-scaling configured and tested
|
||||
- Load balancer configuration verified
|
||||
- SSL/TLS certificates valid
|
||||
2. Monitoring validation:
|
||||
- All critical metrics being collected
|
||||
- Alert rules configured and tested
|
||||
- Dashboard access verified
|
||||
- Log aggregation working
|
||||
3. Disaster recovery validation:
|
||||
- Backup systems operational
|
||||
- Recovery procedures documented and tested
|
||||
- Failover mechanisms verified
|
||||
4. Security validation:
|
||||
- Firewall rules reviewed
|
||||
- Access controls verified
|
||||
- Secrets management confirmed
|
||||
- Vulnerability scan clean
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Infrastructure Readiness Report
|
||||
Timeline: 1 day
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Final Judgment (Day 5-7, Sequential)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔍 Reality Checker — THE FINAL VERDICT
|
||||
```
|
||||
Activate Reality Checker for final integration testing on [PROJECT].
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY PROCESS — DO NOT SKIP:
|
||||
|
||||
Step 1: Reality Check Commands
|
||||
- Verify what was actually built (ls, grep for claimed features)
|
||||
- Cross-check claimed features against specification
|
||||
- Run comprehensive screenshot capture
|
||||
- Review all evidence from Step 1 and Step 2
|
||||
|
||||
Step 2: QA Cross-Validation
|
||||
- Review Evidence Collector findings
|
||||
- Cross-reference with API Tester results
|
||||
- Verify Performance Benchmarker data
|
||||
- Confirm Legal Compliance Checker findings
|
||||
|
||||
Step 3: End-to-End System Validation
|
||||
- Test COMPLETE user journeys (not individual features)
|
||||
- Verify responsive behavior across ALL devices
|
||||
- Check interaction flows end-to-end
|
||||
- Review actual performance data
|
||||
|
||||
Step 4: Specification Reality Check
|
||||
- Quote EXACT text from original specification
|
||||
- Compare with ACTUAL implementation evidence
|
||||
- Document EVERY gap between spec and reality
|
||||
- No assumptions — evidence only
|
||||
|
||||
VERDICT OPTIONS:
|
||||
- READY: Overwhelming evidence of production readiness (rare first pass)
|
||||
- NEEDS WORK: Specific issues identified with fix list (expected)
|
||||
- NOT READY: Major architectural issues requiring Phase 1/2 revisit
|
||||
|
||||
Format: Reality-Based Integration Report
|
||||
Default: NEEDS WORK unless proven otherwise
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate — THE FINAL GATE
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Threshold | Evidence Required |
|
||||
|---|-----------|-----------|-------------------|
|
||||
| 1 | User journeys complete | All critical paths working end-to-end | Reality Checker screenshots |
|
||||
| 2 | Cross-device consistency | Desktop + Tablet + Mobile all working | Responsive screenshots |
|
||||
| 3 | Performance certified | P95 < 200ms, LCP < 2.5s, uptime > 99.9% | Performance Benchmarker report |
|
||||
| 4 | Security validated | Zero critical vulnerabilities | Security scan + compliance report |
|
||||
| 5 | Compliance certified | All regulatory requirements met | Legal Compliance Checker report |
|
||||
| 6 | Specification compliance | 100% of spec requirements implemented | Point-by-point verification |
|
||||
| 7 | Infrastructure ready | Production environment validated | Infrastructure Maintainer report |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Sole authority**: Reality Checker
|
||||
|
||||
### If READY (proceed to Phase 5):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 4 → Phase 5 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### For Launch Team:
|
||||
- Reality Checker certification report
|
||||
- Performance certification
|
||||
- Compliance certification
|
||||
- Infrastructure readiness report
|
||||
- Known limitations (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
### For Growth Hacker:
|
||||
- Product ready for users
|
||||
- Feature list for marketing messaging
|
||||
- Performance data for credibility
|
||||
|
||||
### For DevOps Automator:
|
||||
- Production deployment approved
|
||||
- Blue-green deployment plan
|
||||
- Rollback procedures confirmed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### If NEEDS WORK (return to Phase 3):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 4 → Phase 3 Return Package
|
||||
|
||||
### Fix List (from Reality Checker):
|
||||
1. [Critical Issue 1]: [Description + evidence + fix instruction]
|
||||
2. [Critical Issue 2]: [Description + evidence + fix instruction]
|
||||
3. [High Issue 1]: [Description + evidence + fix instruction]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
### Process:
|
||||
- Issues enter Dev↔QA loop (Phase 3 mechanics)
|
||||
- Each fix must pass Evidence Collector QA
|
||||
- When all fixes complete → Return to Phase 4 Step 3
|
||||
- Reality Checker re-evaluates with updated evidence
|
||||
|
||||
### Expected: 2-3 revision cycles is normal
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### If NOT READY (return to Phase 1/2):
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 4 → Phase 1/2 Return Package
|
||||
|
||||
### Architectural Issues Identified:
|
||||
1. [Fundamental Issue]: [Why it can't be fixed in Phase 3]
|
||||
2. [Structural Problem]: [What needs to change at architecture level]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Action:
|
||||
- [ ] Revise system architecture (Phase 1)
|
||||
- [ ] Rebuild foundation (Phase 2)
|
||||
- [ ] Descope and redefine (Phase 1)
|
||||
|
||||
### Studio Producer Decision Required
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 4 is complete when the Reality Checker issues a READY verdict with overwhelming evidence. NEEDS WORK is the expected first-pass result — it means the system is working but needs polish.*
|
||||
277
strategy/playbooks/phase-5-launch.md
Normal file
277
strategy/playbooks/phase-5-launch.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
|
||||
# 🚀 Phase 5 Playbook — Launch & Growth
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: 2-4 weeks (T-7 through T+14) | **Agents**: 12 | **Gate Keepers**: Studio Producer + Analytics Reporter
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinate go-to-market execution across all channels simultaneously. Maximum impact at launch. Every marketing agent fires in concert while engineering ensures stability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 4 Quality Gate passed (Reality Checker READY verdict)
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 4 Handoff Package received
|
||||
- [ ] Production deployment plan approved
|
||||
- [ ] Marketing content pipeline ready (from Phase 3 Track B)
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
### T-7: Pre-Launch Week
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content & Campaign Preparation (Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE Content Creator:
|
||||
- Finalize all launch content (blog posts, landing pages, email sequences)
|
||||
- Queue content in publishing platforms
|
||||
- Prepare response templates for anticipated questions
|
||||
- Create launch day real-time content plan
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Social Media Strategist:
|
||||
- Finalize cross-platform campaign assets
|
||||
- Schedule pre-launch teaser content
|
||||
- Coordinate influencer partnerships
|
||||
- Prepare platform-specific content variations
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Growth Hacker:
|
||||
- Arm viral mechanics (referral codes, sharing incentives)
|
||||
- Configure growth experiment tracking
|
||||
- Set up funnel analytics
|
||||
- Prepare acquisition channel budgets
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE App Store Optimizer (if mobile):
|
||||
- Finalize store listing (title, description, keywords, screenshots)
|
||||
- Submit app for review (if applicable)
|
||||
- Prepare launch day ASO adjustments
|
||||
- Configure in-app review prompts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Technical Preparation (Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE DevOps Automator:
|
||||
- Prepare blue-green deployment
|
||||
- Verify rollback procedures
|
||||
- Configure feature flags for gradual rollout
|
||||
- Test deployment pipeline end-to-end
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Infrastructure Maintainer:
|
||||
- Configure auto-scaling for 10x expected traffic
|
||||
- Verify monitoring and alerting thresholds
|
||||
- Test disaster recovery procedures
|
||||
- Prepare incident response runbook
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Project Shepherd:
|
||||
- Distribute launch checklist to all agents
|
||||
- Confirm all dependencies resolved
|
||||
- Set up launch day communication channel
|
||||
- Brief stakeholders on launch plan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### T-1: Launch Eve
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
FINAL CHECKLIST (Project Shepherd coordinates):
|
||||
|
||||
Technical:
|
||||
☐ Blue-green deployment tested
|
||||
☐ Rollback procedure verified
|
||||
☐ Auto-scaling configured
|
||||
☐ Monitoring dashboards live
|
||||
☐ Incident response team on standby
|
||||
☐ Feature flags configured
|
||||
|
||||
Content:
|
||||
☐ All content queued and scheduled
|
||||
☐ Email sequences armed
|
||||
☐ Social media posts scheduled
|
||||
☐ Blog posts ready to publish
|
||||
☐ Press materials distributed
|
||||
|
||||
Marketing:
|
||||
☐ Viral mechanics tested
|
||||
☐ Referral system operational
|
||||
☐ Analytics tracking verified
|
||||
☐ Ad campaigns ready to activate
|
||||
☐ Community engagement plan ready
|
||||
|
||||
Support:
|
||||
☐ Support team briefed
|
||||
☐ FAQ and help docs published
|
||||
☐ Escalation procedures confirmed
|
||||
☐ Feedback collection active
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### T-0: Launch Day
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hour 0: Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE DevOps Automator:
|
||||
1. Execute blue-green deployment to production
|
||||
2. Run health checks on all services
|
||||
3. Verify database migrations complete
|
||||
4. Confirm all endpoints responding
|
||||
5. Switch traffic to new deployment
|
||||
6. Monitor error rates for 15 minutes
|
||||
7. Confirm: DEPLOYMENT SUCCESSFUL or ROLLBACK
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Infrastructure Maintainer:
|
||||
1. Monitor all system metrics in real-time
|
||||
2. Watch for traffic spikes and scaling events
|
||||
3. Track error rates and response times
|
||||
4. Alert on any threshold breaches
|
||||
5. Confirm: SYSTEMS STABLE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hour 1-2: Marketing Activation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE Twitter Engager:
|
||||
- Publish launch thread
|
||||
- Engage with early responses
|
||||
- Monitor brand mentions
|
||||
- Amplify positive reactions
|
||||
- Real-time conversation participation
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Reddit Community Builder:
|
||||
- Post authentic launch announcement in relevant subreddits
|
||||
- Engage with comments (value-first, not promotional)
|
||||
- Monitor community sentiment
|
||||
- Respond to technical questions
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Instagram Curator:
|
||||
- Publish launch visual content
|
||||
- Stories with product demos
|
||||
- Engage with early followers
|
||||
- Cross-promote with other channels
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE TikTok Strategist:
|
||||
- Publish launch videos
|
||||
- Monitor for viral potential
|
||||
- Engage with comments
|
||||
- Adjust content based on early performance
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hour 2-8: Monitoring & Response
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE Support Responder:
|
||||
- Handle incoming user inquiries
|
||||
- Document common issues
|
||||
- Escalate technical problems to engineering
|
||||
- Collect early user feedback
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Analytics Reporter:
|
||||
- Real-time metrics dashboard
|
||||
- Hourly traffic and conversion reports
|
||||
- Channel attribution tracking
|
||||
- User behavior flow analysis
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Feedback Synthesizer:
|
||||
- Monitor all feedback channels
|
||||
- Categorize incoming feedback
|
||||
- Identify critical issues
|
||||
- Prioritize user-reported problems
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### T+1 to T+7: Post-Launch Week
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
DAILY CADENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
Morning:
|
||||
├── Analytics Reporter → Daily metrics report
|
||||
├── Feedback Synthesizer → Feedback summary
|
||||
├── Infrastructure Maintainer → System health report
|
||||
└── Growth Hacker → Channel performance analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Afternoon:
|
||||
├── Content Creator → Response content based on reception
|
||||
├── Social Media Strategist → Engagement optimization
|
||||
├── Experiment Tracker → Launch A/B test results
|
||||
└── Support Responder → Issue resolution summary
|
||||
|
||||
Evening:
|
||||
├── Executive Summary Generator → Daily stakeholder briefing
|
||||
├── Project Shepherd → Cross-team coordination
|
||||
└── DevOps Automator → Deployment of hotfixes (if needed)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### T+7 to T+14: Optimization Week
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACTIVATE Growth Hacker:
|
||||
- Analyze first-week acquisition data
|
||||
- Optimize conversion funnels based on data
|
||||
- Scale winning channels, cut losing ones
|
||||
- Refine viral mechanics based on K-factor data
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Analytics Reporter:
|
||||
- Week 1 comprehensive analysis
|
||||
- Cohort analysis of launch users
|
||||
- Retention curve analysis
|
||||
- Revenue/engagement metrics
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Experiment Tracker:
|
||||
- Launch systematic A/B tests
|
||||
- Test onboarding variations
|
||||
- Test pricing/packaging (if applicable)
|
||||
- Test feature discovery flows
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVATE Executive Summary Generator:
|
||||
- Week 1 executive summary (SCQA format)
|
||||
- Key metrics vs. targets
|
||||
- Recommendations for Week 2+
|
||||
- Resource reallocation suggestions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Evidence Source | Status |
|
||||
|---|-----------|----------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | Deployment successful (zero-downtime) | DevOps Automator deployment logs | ☐ |
|
||||
| 2 | Systems stable (no P0/P1 in 48 hours) | Infrastructure Maintainer monitoring | ☐ |
|
||||
| 3 | User acquisition channels active | Analytics Reporter dashboard | ☐ |
|
||||
| 4 | Feedback loop operational | Feedback Synthesizer report | ☐ |
|
||||
| 5 | Stakeholders informed | Executive Summary Generator output | ☐ |
|
||||
| 6 | Support operational | Support Responder metrics | ☐ |
|
||||
| 7 | Growth metrics tracking | Growth Hacker channel reports | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Dual sign-off**: Studio Producer (strategic) + Analytics Reporter (data)
|
||||
|
||||
- **STABLE**: Product launched, systems stable, growth active → Phase 6 activation
|
||||
- **CRITICAL**: Major issues requiring immediate engineering response → Hotfix cycle
|
||||
- **ROLLBACK**: Fundamental problems → Revert deployment, return to Phase 4
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff to Phase 6
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Phase 5 → Phase 6 Handoff Package
|
||||
|
||||
### For Ongoing Operations:
|
||||
- Launch metrics baseline (Analytics Reporter)
|
||||
- User feedback themes (Feedback Synthesizer)
|
||||
- System performance baseline (Infrastructure Maintainer)
|
||||
- Growth channel performance (Growth Hacker)
|
||||
- Support issue patterns (Support Responder)
|
||||
|
||||
### For Continuous Improvement:
|
||||
- A/B test results and learnings (Experiment Tracker)
|
||||
- Process improvement recommendations (Workflow Optimizer)
|
||||
- Financial performance vs. projections (Finance Tracker)
|
||||
- Compliance monitoring status (Legal Compliance Checker)
|
||||
|
||||
### Operational Cadences Established:
|
||||
- Daily: System monitoring, support, analytics
|
||||
- Weekly: Analytics report, feedback synthesis, sprint planning
|
||||
- Monthly: Executive summary, financial review, compliance check
|
||||
- Quarterly: Strategic review, process optimization, market intelligence
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 5 is complete when the product is deployed, systems are stable for 48+ hours, growth channels are active, and the feedback loop is operational.*
|
||||
318
strategy/playbooks/phase-6-operate.md
Normal file
318
strategy/playbooks/phase-6-operate.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
|
||||
# 🔄 Phase 6 Playbook — Operate & Evolve
|
||||
|
||||
> **Duration**: Ongoing | **Agents**: 12+ (rotating) | **Governance**: Studio Producer
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Sustained operations with continuous improvement. The product is live — now make it thrive. This phase has no end date; it runs as long as the product is in market.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 5 Quality Gate passed (stable launch)
|
||||
- [ ] Phase 5 Handoff Package received
|
||||
- [ ] Operational cadences established
|
||||
- [ ] Baseline metrics documented
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational Cadences
|
||||
|
||||
### Continuous (Always Active)
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Responsibility | SLA |
|
||||
|-------|---------------|-----|
|
||||
| **Infrastructure Maintainer** | System uptime, performance, security | 99.9% uptime, < 30min MTTR |
|
||||
| **Support Responder** | Customer support, issue resolution | < 4hr first response |
|
||||
| **DevOps Automator** | Deployment pipeline, hotfixes | Multiple deploys/day capability |
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Activity | Output |
|
||||
|-------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **Analytics Reporter** | KPI dashboard update | Daily metrics snapshot |
|
||||
| **Support Responder** | Issue triage and resolution | Support ticket summary |
|
||||
| **Infrastructure Maintainer** | System health check | Health status report |
|
||||
|
||||
### Weekly
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Activity | Output |
|
||||
|-------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **Analytics Reporter** | Weekly performance analysis | Weekly Analytics Report |
|
||||
| **Feedback Synthesizer** | User feedback synthesis | Weekly Feedback Summary |
|
||||
| **Sprint Prioritizer** | Backlog grooming + sprint planning | Sprint Plan |
|
||||
| **Growth Hacker** | Growth channel optimization | Growth Metrics Report |
|
||||
| **Project Shepherd** | Cross-team coordination | Weekly Status Update |
|
||||
|
||||
### Bi-Weekly
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Activity | Output |
|
||||
|-------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **Feedback Synthesizer** | Deep feedback analysis | Bi-Weekly Insights Report |
|
||||
| **Experiment Tracker** | A/B test analysis | Experiment Results Summary |
|
||||
| **Content Creator** | Content calendar execution | Published Content Report |
|
||||
|
||||
### Monthly
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Activity | Output |
|
||||
|-------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **Executive Summary Generator** | C-suite reporting | Monthly Executive Summary |
|
||||
| **Finance Tracker** | Financial performance review | Monthly Financial Report |
|
||||
| **Legal Compliance Checker** | Regulatory monitoring | Compliance Status Report |
|
||||
| **Trend Researcher** | Market intelligence update | Monthly Market Brief |
|
||||
| **Brand Guardian** | Brand consistency audit | Brand Health Report |
|
||||
|
||||
### Quarterly
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Activity | Output |
|
||||
|-------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **Studio Producer** | Strategic portfolio review | Quarterly Strategic Review |
|
||||
| **Workflow Optimizer** | Process efficiency audit | Optimization Report |
|
||||
| **Performance Benchmarker** | Performance regression testing | Quarterly Performance Report |
|
||||
| **Tool Evaluator** | Technology stack review | Tech Debt Assessment |
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuous Improvement Loop
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
MEASURE (Analytics Reporter)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
ANALYZE (Feedback Synthesizer + Data Analytics Reporter)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
PLAN (Sprint Prioritizer + Studio Producer)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
BUILD (Phase 3 Dev↔QA Loop — mini-cycles)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
VALIDATE (Evidence Collector + Reality Checker)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
DEPLOY (DevOps Automator)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
MEASURE (back to start)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Development in Phase 6
|
||||
|
||||
New features follow a compressed NEXUS cycle:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Sprint Prioritizer selects feature from backlog
|
||||
2. Appropriate Developer Agent implements
|
||||
3. Evidence Collector validates (Dev↔QA loop)
|
||||
4. DevOps Automator deploys (feature flag or direct)
|
||||
5. Experiment Tracker monitors (A/B test if applicable)
|
||||
6. Analytics Reporter measures impact
|
||||
7. Feedback Synthesizer collects user response
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Incident Response Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
### Severity Levels
|
||||
|
||||
| Level | Definition | Response Time | Decision Authority |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|--------------|-------------------|
|
||||
| **P0 — Critical** | Service down, data loss, security breach | Immediate | Studio Producer |
|
||||
| **P1 — High** | Major feature broken, significant degradation | < 1 hour | Project Shepherd |
|
||||
| **P2 — Medium** | Minor feature issue, workaround available | < 4 hours | Agents Orchestrator |
|
||||
| **P3 — Low** | Cosmetic issue, minor inconvenience | Next sprint | Sprint Prioritizer |
|
||||
|
||||
### Incident Response Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
DETECTION (Infrastructure Maintainer or Support Responder)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
TRIAGE (Agents Orchestrator)
|
||||
├── Classify severity (P0-P3)
|
||||
├── Assign response team
|
||||
└── Notify stakeholders
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
RESPONSE
|
||||
├── P0: Infrastructure Maintainer + DevOps Automator + Backend Architect
|
||||
├── P1: Relevant Developer Agent + DevOps Automator
|
||||
├── P2: Relevant Developer Agent
|
||||
└── P3: Added to sprint backlog
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
RESOLUTION
|
||||
├── Fix implemented and deployed
|
||||
├── Evidence Collector verifies fix
|
||||
└── Infrastructure Maintainer confirms stability
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
POST-MORTEM
|
||||
├── Workflow Optimizer leads retrospective
|
||||
├── Root cause analysis documented
|
||||
├── Prevention measures identified
|
||||
└── Process improvements implemented
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Growth Operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Monthly Growth Review (Growth Hacker leads)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Channel Performance Analysis
|
||||
- Acquisition by channel (organic, paid, referral, social)
|
||||
- CAC by channel
|
||||
- Conversion rates by funnel stage
|
||||
- LTV:CAC ratio trends
|
||||
|
||||
2. Experiment Results
|
||||
- Completed A/B tests and outcomes
|
||||
- Statistical significance validation
|
||||
- Winner implementation status
|
||||
- New experiment pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
3. Retention Analysis
|
||||
- Cohort retention curves
|
||||
- Churn risk identification
|
||||
- Re-engagement campaign results
|
||||
- Feature adoption metrics
|
||||
|
||||
4. Growth Roadmap Update
|
||||
- Next month's growth experiments
|
||||
- Channel budget reallocation
|
||||
- New channel exploration
|
||||
- Viral coefficient optimization
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Operations (Content Creator + Social Media Strategist)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Weekly:
|
||||
- Content calendar execution
|
||||
- Social media engagement
|
||||
- Community management
|
||||
- Performance tracking
|
||||
|
||||
Monthly:
|
||||
- Content performance review
|
||||
- Editorial calendar planning
|
||||
- Platform algorithm updates
|
||||
- Content strategy refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Platform-Specific:
|
||||
- Twitter Engager → Daily engagement, weekly threads
|
||||
- Instagram Curator → 3-5 posts/week, daily stories
|
||||
- TikTok Strategist → 3-5 videos/week
|
||||
- Reddit Community Builder → Daily authentic engagement
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Financial Operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Monthly Financial Review (Finance Tracker)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Revenue Analysis
|
||||
- MRR/ARR tracking
|
||||
- Revenue by segment/plan
|
||||
- Expansion revenue
|
||||
- Churn revenue impact
|
||||
|
||||
2. Cost Analysis
|
||||
- Infrastructure costs
|
||||
- Marketing spend by channel
|
||||
- Team/resource costs
|
||||
- Tool and service costs
|
||||
|
||||
3. Unit Economics
|
||||
- CAC trends
|
||||
- LTV trends
|
||||
- LTV:CAC ratio
|
||||
- Payback period
|
||||
|
||||
4. Forecasting
|
||||
- Revenue forecast (3-month rolling)
|
||||
- Cost forecast
|
||||
- Cash flow projection
|
||||
- Budget variance analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance Operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Monthly Compliance Check (Legal Compliance Checker)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Regulatory Monitoring
|
||||
- New regulations affecting the product
|
||||
- Existing regulation changes
|
||||
- Enforcement actions in the industry
|
||||
- Compliance deadline tracking
|
||||
|
||||
2. Privacy Compliance
|
||||
- Data subject request handling
|
||||
- Consent management effectiveness
|
||||
- Data retention policy adherence
|
||||
- Cross-border transfer compliance
|
||||
|
||||
3. Security Compliance
|
||||
- Vulnerability scan results
|
||||
- Patch management status
|
||||
- Access control review
|
||||
- Incident log review
|
||||
|
||||
4. Audit Readiness
|
||||
- Documentation currency
|
||||
- Evidence collection status
|
||||
- Training completion rates
|
||||
- Policy acknowledgment tracking
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Evolution
|
||||
|
||||
### Quarterly Strategic Review (Studio Producer)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Market Position Assessment
|
||||
- Competitive landscape changes (Trend Researcher input)
|
||||
- Market share evolution
|
||||
- Brand perception (Brand Guardian input)
|
||||
- Customer satisfaction trends (Feedback Synthesizer input)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Product Strategy
|
||||
- Feature roadmap review
|
||||
- Technology debt assessment (Tool Evaluator input)
|
||||
- Platform expansion opportunities
|
||||
- Partnership evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
3. Growth Strategy
|
||||
- Channel effectiveness review
|
||||
- New market opportunities
|
||||
- Pricing strategy assessment
|
||||
- Expansion planning
|
||||
|
||||
4. Organizational Health
|
||||
- Process efficiency (Workflow Optimizer input)
|
||||
- Team performance metrics
|
||||
- Resource allocation optimization
|
||||
- Capability development needs
|
||||
|
||||
Output: Quarterly Strategic Review → Updated roadmap and priorities
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 6 Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Metric | Target | Owner |
|
||||
|----------|--------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| **Reliability** | System uptime | > 99.9% | Infrastructure Maintainer |
|
||||
| **Reliability** | MTTR | < 30 minutes | Infrastructure Maintainer |
|
||||
| **Growth** | MoM user growth | > 20% | Growth Hacker |
|
||||
| **Growth** | Activation rate | > 60% | Analytics Reporter |
|
||||
| **Retention** | Day 7 retention | > 40% | Analytics Reporter |
|
||||
| **Retention** | Day 30 retention | > 20% | Analytics Reporter |
|
||||
| **Financial** | LTV:CAC ratio | > 3:1 | Finance Tracker |
|
||||
| **Financial** | Portfolio ROI | > 25% | Studio Producer |
|
||||
| **Quality** | NPS score | > 50 | Feedback Synthesizer |
|
||||
| **Quality** | Support resolution time | < 4 hours | Support Responder |
|
||||
| **Compliance** | Regulatory adherence | > 98% | Legal Compliance Checker |
|
||||
| **Efficiency** | Deployment frequency | Multiple/day | DevOps Automator |
|
||||
| **Efficiency** | Process improvement | 20%/quarter | Workflow Optimizer |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase 6 has no end date. It runs as long as the product is in market, with continuous improvement cycles driving the product forward. The NEXUS pipeline can be re-activated (NEXUS-Sprint or NEXUS-Micro) for major new features or pivots.*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user